Viewing Document
Title Q & A: Jim Meyer, Former UC Davis Chancellor
File Options PDF | Additional Information
Quick Link Repository View: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?a=69806
Direct to File: https://ucanr.edu/repository/a/?get=69806
Abstract Jim Meyer joined UC in 1951 as an instructor of animal husbandry at the Davis campus. He was appointed chair of the Department of Animal Science nine years later and in 1963 was named dean of the College of Agriculture. He went on to serve as chancellor of UC Davis from 1969 to 1987. During his tenure as chancellor, four new campuswide divisions and the Graduate School of Management were established, and enrollment jumped from 12,000 to nearly 20,000 students. Retired since 1987, Meyer is now actively researching what the future may hold for Land Grant colleges of agriculture.

Author
Bailey, Pat
Public Information Representative
Agriculture and veterinary medicine
Publication Date Nov 1, 1996
Date Added May 14, 2009
Copyright © The Regents of the University of California
Copyright Year 1996
OCR Text
JimMeyer Former UC Davis Chancellor JimMeyer joined UC in 1951 as an instructor of animal husbandry at the Davis campus . He was appointed chair of the Department of Animal Science nine years later and in 1963 was named dean of the College of Agriculture . He went on to serve as chancellor of UC Davis from 1969 to 1987 . During his tenure as chancellor , four new campuswide divisions and the Graduate School of Management were established , and enrollment jumped from 12,000 to nearly 20,000 students . Retired since 1987 , Meyer is now actively researching what the future may hold for Land Grant colleges of agriculture . What were society's expectations of the colleges of At the time you joined the University , what was the mood in agri - agriculture ? culture and in the University ? The mood was really quite upbeat . In those days you I don't think society had any expectationbecause food JM : JM : started as an instructor and spent 2 years before you be - was readily available and it was of high quality . The ex - came an assistant professor . The 2 - year program was pectations shifted from farmers to the agri - industry phased out by side , the big commercialcompanies such as the fertil - 1956 - 58 . Then Clark Kerr began to de - izer companies . They organized into associationsand centralize the university and in 1959 , the master plan greatly influenced the agricultural colleges . for higher education was written . So it was a very excit - Looking at changes that took place , let me empha - ing time , a time of change . size the three functions of a land - grant college - teach - Enrollment went down in the late ' 50s and ' 60s . ing , research and outreach or extension . As far as teach - There was a move from farmers being the main element ing is concerned , the land grant colleges of agriculture of agriculture to the development of the agricultural in - shifted to more basic courses and started to offer new dustry , of which farmers were a part . Soon , as much ef - courses that the public would be interested in . fort in the production of food was made by those off the Researchwise , this collegeand other agricultural farm as on the farm , supplying the fertilizers , the pesti - colleges across the United States contributed a great cides and so forth . So agriculture was changing , which deal . Over time , the research changed . In the past , the was one reason student enrollment went down - not as faculty did more applied research , but a lot of the ap - many farmers were needed . plied research eventually moved to industry since in - Mechanization began in the 1960s and had a dra - dustry provided matic impact . A second dramatic impact was Rachel so many of the inputs such as fertilizer , Carson's book pesticides and Silent Spring , and pesticides became an so forth . Industry could make money by issue . With that , plus the concern about a broader ap - doing the research and developingnew products.Take proach to the environment , this college changed its Calgene , for example.Now industry is doing very applied , name to the College of Agricultural and Environmental technologicalresearch . Sciencesin A lot of the demonstration research has moved into 1968 . Extension.Farm advisors are now doing research We had a very exciting time in our college here . - taking a known principle and applying it to different The faculty and administration were responding to the needs in agriculture . At the same time , we were looking environmental situations . Industry changes have had to the future and seeing the problems of pesticides , en - quite an impact on agricultural and environmental sci - vironmental quality and ences . so on . The other way that Extension has changed is that The vice president's officein agriculture at that private groups time delegated authority to the deans on campuses to - that is , paid consultants - have started doing extension work for hire . They might have take care of problems . There were major problems such 10 or 20 dairies that they consult with and visit once a as pear decline , on which this campus's pomology de - partment did a lot . A move toward mechanization led month . They look at the computer system , talk about to the development of the mechanical tomato harvester the price of feed and work on problems such as mastitis . A lot of the extension work is now done by these and new varieties of tomatoes . Then , of course , there people . It's growing faster in California than in any was the decrease in farm labor needs . The starlings also other state . were a problem and that was kind of a fun project.They I think change was bound to continue , and I don't did solve it pretty much ; they aren't a problem any think that's bad . But just as we responded to changes in more . Verticilliumwilt caused problems in cotton in the Central Valley . It was a great time for the college to 1950s and ' ~ O St , he system is going to have to re - the solve problems . spond to new changes now . CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE , NOVEMBER - DECEMBER1996 39one out of three new hires in animal science is a The original driving force for the land - grant col - woman . We also have Barbara Schneeman as dean . This leges was to meet agriculture's needs . When they were resulted in an enlarged pool of excellence for the College . started , the poor people of this country were on farms . So the land - grant concept was started to improve the Looking toward the future , what is the most important task for the quality of life for the people on the farms.One of the ways Division and for UC ? to do that was to improve the productivity of the farms . Then , of course , the farmers became fewer and fewer in number . Now what is the driving force ? The I think the Division needs to catch up with societal JM : driving force will no doubt be population pressure . Be - needs and the efficiency of decentralized decision mak - cause we have expertise in natural resources , all of ing . We need to respond to the impact of population these collegeswill work on problems of environmental growth on environmental quality and food needs . quality as it pertains to food production and quality of so far we've been able to keep up People will say that life . On this campus , there are several environmentally fu - with population growth , but we need to look to the oriented departments ; even in the Department of Ani - ture and consider how population growth has and will mal Science , research is moving toward environmental impact air and water quality . Of course this is a prob - science , which includes pollution . For example , we have so big that it will require the attention of more than lem a faculty member who primarily works on manure just the colleges of agriculture . An entire campus must management . This department , in looking at its future be involved . research , is looking at both the environmental and food production sciences.It may be that environmental prob - What have you discovered in your studies for the Kellogg Founda - lems will keep this kind of institution in business for the tion on how to effect change in the land - grant colleges of agriculture ? foreseeablefuture . Each state must respond to the driving forces of its own JM : What were UC's most significant research and extension contribu - UC Davis's population and environmental concerns . tions during those years , particularly in your area of expertise ? agricultural college did lead the way starting in the 1960s , signifiedby its name change in 1968 . New En - I think the faculty's research quality at both the applied gland has responded quickly , the South much more JM : and basic levels was excellent . In teaching , the main slowly . I don't know how California will respond . contribution was to broaden the curriculum to include I'm sure almost all of the colleges of agriculture environmental studies and courses . Research and exten - will focus on the environmental issues . They'll have to go hand in hand . The faculty did a good job sion had to address problems both of the environment and of agri - so that new processesand industries of problem solving culture . But environmental issues will be the driving could evolve . force . Their clientelewill be consumers , environmental In the specificarea of animal sciences , the nutrition - interests and the agricultural industry . Leaders of agri - ists and physiologists did applied and basic research , cultural colleges throughout the country realize that such as on bloat . The geneticists.worked on the problem there will be great variation between the states . of dwarfingin beef cattle . We moved into net - energysys - But teaching , research and extension will always be tems for evaluating livestockfeed , and sheep researchers their main functions.These collegesmust decide who in twinning . You can't pick out any - becameinterested their clientelewill be and look to the state and federal specifically , because you had about 16 activitiescom - thing governments for funding . ing togetherat the same time . In the land - grant colleges , leadership will be key . The colleges will find that their main connectionsto the U.S . De - federal governmentwill be not only through the How have societal changes over the last 50 years influenced the Divi - partment of Agriculturebut also through the Environmen - sion of Agricultural and Natural Resources ? tal Protection Agency , the NationalScienceFoundation and the National Institutes of Health . I see that as positive . One of the big changes has been that women have come JM : - Pat Bailey into the department and campuses . Now it seems like http : / / www.ucop.edu / anrhorne / danr.htmI CALIFORNIAAGRICULTURE ASSOCIATE EDITORS Lorrie.Mandoriao @ ucop.edu Animal , Avian , Aquaculture Human & Community Pest Management Telephone : ( 510 ) 987 - 0044 & Veterinary Sciences Edward G . Platzer Development Fax : ( 510 ) 465 - 2659 Christopher M . Dewees Linda M . Manton Joseph G . Hancock , Jr . Kathryn Radke Rust Karen P . Varcoe Michael K . I . Osburn Bennie Frank G . Zalom Land , Air & Water Sciences Barbara A . Reed Pam Matson Plant Sciences Economics & Public Policy Garrison Sposito Jodie S . Holt Harold 0 . Carter F . Jackson Lee Henry J . Vaux . Jr . Alvin Sokolow G . Steven Sibbett Natural Resources Food & Nutrition Barbara H . Allen - Diaz BarbaraSchneeman W . Anderson Daniel Eunice Williamson Richard B . Standiford
Posted By
You posted this document. You may edit this document.
This document has been viewed 183 times.